Science Hub

< All Collaborations

What is the Science Hub?

The SCC Integrated Science Hub for Agriculture and Ecosystems (“The Science Hub”) advances SCC’s strategic goals and enhances the scientific foundations of agency programs and projects at the nexus of agricultural activities and ecosystems.

The Science Hub will generate, distill, and amplify approaches that protect and enhance natural resources and agricultural viability, advance climate resiliency outcomes within agency programs and cultivate collaborative partnerships that foster holistic, multi-benefit solutions within the voluntary conservation framework.

The Science Hub will serve as a conduit for collaborations – e.g., staff at federal, state, county, and Tribal governments, conservation districts, universities, businesses, and non-governmental organizations.  Science and data frameworks developed within the Science Hub will inform adaptive management opportunities for the SCC, conservation districts, and external partners.

The goals of this work are to:

  • Help improve ecosystem functions on agricultural land at the watershed level through strategic implementation of agricultural conservation practices and watershed planning, prioritization, and monitoring.
  • Assess incentive approaches for conservation practices and determine which have the greatest impact on voluntary conservation.
  • Utilize adaptive management to maximize positive impacts of voluntary conservation.

These efforts will be collaborative and complementary to the science performed by other agencies and partners. Another key goal of the Integrated Science Hub is to reduce the gap between existing science used and developed by multiple state agencies (often separately) and on ­the­ ground results desired by many stakeholders statewide (e.g., improved ecosystem functions).

In 2023, one-time proviso funding was appropriated for the formation of the Science Hub.

Ag Science Program (Ecosystem Monitoring): "One-time funding ($1,000,000) is provided solely to connect scientists, practitioners, and researchers and coordinate efforts to monitor and quantify benefits of best management practices on agricultural lands, and better understand values and motivations of landowners to implement voluntary incentive programs."

More Coming Soon!

  • Download the FAQ
  • Access the Riparian Economic Synthesis to explore how riparian incentive programs influence landowner participation, including key lessons, costs, benefits, and recommendations to strengthen conservation outcomes.
  • Explore the Economic Incentives for Riparian Conservation report to learn how economic, legal, and policy factors shape participation, and access a practical toolbox for developing locally tailored incentive programs.
  • Science Hub Questionnaire: We greatly value your input and experience as the Science Hub develops. Click here to share examples, links, or documents you may have about collaborative, community-based science outreach and engagement.

For questions, please contact Levi Keesecker, Ecosystems Manager & Science Hub Lead.

Why Landowners Participate
Conservation Benefits
Science in Action
Collaboration
Pilot Watersheds

Why Landowners Participate in Conservation

Effective conservation starts with understanding what motivates landowners. This work explores the economic, social, and practical factors that influence participation in voluntary conservation, including incentives, stewardship values, risk, and long-term land management goals. Insights help shape programs that are locally relevant, accessible, and more likely to result in lasting conservation outcomes.

Resources:

Riparian Economic Synthesis: Opportunities for Washington State

Explores how incentive programs can motivate landowners to adopt riparian conservation and improve participation across Washington.

Economic Incentives for Riparian Conservation

Examines how incentive payments support voluntary riparian restoration and provides guidance for locally tailored program design. Also related to: Conservation Benefits

CRM History Webinar

Introduces Coordinated Resource Management (CRM) and how collaboration and trust influence conservation participation. Also related to: Collaboration

Community-Based Social Marketing (CBSM) Strategy Implementation

Applies behavior-change science to identify barriers and motivators influencing conservation adoption and improve program effectiveness.

Agricultural Viability Community Survey

Explores landowner priorities, economic realities, and decision drivers shaping participation in conservation. Also related to: Science in Action

Perspectives on the Palouse Documentary

Story-driven exploration of land, community, and stewardship values shaping conservation decisions. Also related to: Pilot Watersheds

Benefits of Conservation Practices

Conservation practices deliver multiple benefits across landscapes and communities. This work highlights how actions such as riparian restoration, soil health improvements, and habitat protection support water quality, fish and wildlife, climate resilience, and long-term sustainability of working lands.

Resources

Economic Incentives for Riparian Conservation

Shows how conservation delivers public benefits such as water quality, habitat, and ecosystem resilience.

Wetlands Intrinsic Potential Tool (WIP)

Uses modeling to identify wetland restoration opportunities and ecological benefits. Also related to: Science in Action

Glyphosate Impacts Report

Examines ecological impacts affecting aquatic systems and informs conservation and management decisions. Also related to: Science in Action | Pilot Watersheds

Low Tech Process-Based Restoration Certificate

Builds capacity for restoration approaches that improve habitat, hydrology, and long-term ecosystem function. Also related to: Pilot Watersheds

Mapping Best Management Practices (BMPs) / Cleaning CPDS Data

Improves understanding of where conservation practices occur and the outcomes they produce. Also related to: Science in Action

Cloud-Based Ecosystem Monitoring (Voluntary Stewardship Program & Climate Resilience)

Tracks environmental outcomes to better understand conservation benefits across landscapes. Also related to: Science in Action | Pilot Watersheds

Using Science to Improve Conservation

Science strengthens conservation by helping target the right actions in the right places. This work connects research, data, and decision-support tools with on-the-ground experience from conservation districts to improve effectiveness, guide implementation, and better understand conservation outcomes.

Resources

PM Tool Development

Develops tools to improve planning, targeting, and effectiveness of conservation implementation.

Science Hub Framework Informational Handout

Explains how science, data, and partnerships guide conservation decision-making.

Social Network and Collaboration Tool Development

Explores systems to improve information sharing and applied learning across conservation partners.

Wetlands Intrinsic Potential Tool

Uses science and modeling to guide restoration planning and decision-making.

Glyphosate Impacts Report

Applies research to improve conservation and water quality outcomes.

Mapping BMPs / Cleaning CPDS Data

Improves data quality to strengthen conservation analysis and decision-making.

Cloud-Based Ecosystem Monitoring

Applies monitoring science to evaluate conservation outcomes and climate resilience.

Ag Viability Community Survey

Uses social and economic data to inform conservation program design.

Coordinated Resource Management (CRM)

Coordinated Resource Management (CRM) supports locally driven, partnership-based approaches to conservation. By bringing together landowners, conservation districts, tribes, agencies, and community partners, CRM helps address shared resource challenges, align priorities, and support durable, landscape-scale solutions.

Resources

Coordinated Resource Management (CRM) History Webinar

Informational webinar explaining the CRM model and its role in collaborative, locally driven conservation. Prepared by The Center for Technical Development and SCC.

Coordinated Resource Management (CRM) Survey & Report

Survey and report analyzes Coordinated Resource Management and Coordinated Weed Management Area groups to understand strengths, gaps, and opportunities for collaborative conservation. Prepared by Whatcom Conservation District.

Pilot Watersheds

The following pilot watersheds are where the Science Hub’s strategies come together in real-world settings. In partnership with conservation districts and landowners, these landscapes apply research, incentive approaches, monitoring tools, and collaborative models to improve conservation outcomes on the ground.

These efforts connect what motivates participation, how conservation delivers measurable benefits, and how science and partnerships can strengthen implementation. By testing and refining these approaches within working watersheds, pilot projects help inform future conservation across Washington.

Columbia Conservation District

Mason Conservation District

Spokane Conservation District

Whatcom Conservation District